View Full Version : SUCH an amazing level of bullplop here (woman claims she cant get laid, basically)
Million
09-02-2006, 08:54 PM
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/445903p-375434c.html
http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=156771
29-Year-Old Virgin Turns to JANE Magazine to Help Her Get Lucky Before the Clock Strikes 30
JANE Magazine Launches a "Sarah Needs You" Website Dedicated to Helping Sarah Lose the Big "V"
NEW YORK, NY -- (MARKET WIRE) -- August 23, 2006 -- While "every harlot was a virgin once," few women maintain their chastity into adulthood. JANE magazine, www.janemag.com, built for the 20-something woman who is gutsy, cool and smart, is on a crusade to help Sarah DiMuro, a self-professed 29-year-old virgin, get deflowered before her 30th birthday on November 7th.
Sarah DiMuro, a pretty, blonde comedian who lives and works in New York City, contacted JANE to help her find the right guy to have sex with. DiMuro is from Cranston, Rhode Island. She graduated from Smith College and currently resides in a women-only hotel in Manhattan where gentlemen callers cannot go beyond the "courting parlor."
(Click here for details)
Sarah DiMuro
Highlighted Links
JANE Magazine
"I am a girl who is not particularly religious nor prudish or shy, but I was a complete and utter dork growing up," says Sarah DiMuro. "I had braces, teenage acne, and experienced social shyness and, as a result, only attended all women's educational institutions. I have wonderful parents and come from a great background, but just never really got a chance to, well, 'do it.' I've decided that enough time has been wasted, so I turned to JANE to help me find my first lover. I never thought I'd be approaching my 30th birthday as a virgin who hasn't found a meaningful connection, but here I am."
"When our readers reach out for help, we're here to guide them through life's challenges," said Brandon Holley, JANE 's editor-in-chief. "Sarah DiMuro reached out to JANE asking for our assistance in finding her a man worthy of leaving her chastity behind. We'll do what it takes to get the job done!"
The magazine's web site will feature a "Sarah Needs You" section at www.janemag.com/virgin, dedicated to helping Sarah find the right guy. Readers are invited to nominate candidates to date Sarah and can browse through a slideshow of Sarah's potential suitors displayed in her digital black book. Sarah's Dating Blog will feature her commentary after every date. The "Pick Sarah's Date" feature offers web readers the ability to vote on who Sarah goes out with next.
The name is Sarah Dimuro if you want to google for more links. It's been a long time since I've sensed such powerful, obvious bullshit. This is amazing...fascinating...intriguing. There's just no way.
Quick summation: She's 29 and supposedly a virgin. She has enlisted the aide of Jane magazine to find some guy to fuck her before she hits 30. Nigga please x85. You've GOT to be kidding me on this.
I mean, come on...take a good look at that picture of her. This is more absurd than an amalgamation of the Last of the Dodos and Mr. Myxzylplk.
Anyway, I just heard the story off Headline News' Showbiz Tonight.(aka The Brooke Anderson Show. good lord that's a piece of ass..) Discuss.
white shadow
09-02-2006, 08:59 PM
You just can't see her tail and cloven feet that's all.
Yasashiyama
09-02-2006, 09:01 PM
Dude, she's butt ugly. No wonder she's still a virgin.
ShinAkumax
09-02-2006, 09:07 PM
Tonight, another episode of SRK calling a prefectly normal looking girl ugly.
SNAAAAKE
09-02-2006, 09:23 PM
so she is from new york. I'd give her a piece of TEH SNAAAAAAKE ! :devil:
(yeah I fuck ugly chicks..sue me)
Jaldaboath
09-02-2006, 09:24 PM
prefectly normal looking girl Except for the fact that her cheekbones are the size of goddamn missouri.
Rhio2k
09-02-2006, 09:25 PM
I'll fix her problem with the quickness...maybe I should look at her pic first. But still, as long as she ain't fat, I'll plow her like an ex Burn Knuckle. *does more reading, and checks out prospective dudes* Never mind. Bitch isn't into black guys.
Warpticon
09-02-2006, 09:28 PM
She most certainly is not real-world ugly. I certainly wouldn't call her "gorgeous" like they do there, though.
As for whether I'd hit it, not in a million years.
Roxie
09-02-2006, 09:30 PM
Ugly? What, y'all are all signed to modeling contracts? Some studly motherfuckers in here, huh? Just 10's, all of you.
Anway, million you missed a virgin who hasn't found a meaningful connection
Course, I'm sure there's more to it than that.
10? Im a fuckin 12.
Send the chick my way, Ill solve this issue REAL fuckin fast.
SNAAAAKE
09-02-2006, 09:38 PM
Ugly? What, y'all are all signed to modeling contracts? Some studly motherfuckers in here, huh? Just 10's, all of you.
Anway, million you missed
Course, I'm sure there's more to it than that.
um...she isnt attractive. If I were to rate her I'd say 6/10. I am not being shallow but its fact. I'd still hit it though cuz I am desperate :looney:
PS: I AM a 10/10..ok maybe not 10 but easily 8..my pic speaks for itself !
chippermonky
09-02-2006, 09:46 PM
It's because you can't see her penis. And she is butt ugly.
Etcetera
09-02-2006, 09:47 PM
contacted JANE to help her find the right guy to have sex with
This bitch can go to hell.
It isn't that she can't get laid, she just can't get the type of guys she wants to fuck her to fuck her which I am sure is due to her pricing herself outside of the market. I hope who ever bones her gives her Super AIDS.
Nick T.
09-02-2006, 09:49 PM
um...she isnt attractive. If I were to rate her I'd say 6/10. I am not being shallow but its fact. I'd still hit it though cuz I am desperate :looney:
You're too nice.
She looks too average to me. I would say 5/10.
EDIT:
I retract my first rating and say 3/10. She has man eyes with Jay Lenos chin.
Roxie:
If you were a lesbian or a guy, you'd understand.
:)
BTW if you look at the Janemag link then click on the video, its not her looks that don't get her laid, its her personality. She sounds obsessed and talks wayyyy too much.
spudlyff8fan
09-02-2006, 09:51 PM
I don't think she's ugly. Or hot. She's plain.
But any lady who says they can't get some is a LIAR.
*InVeRs3*
09-02-2006, 09:55 PM
She's a liar.
And she has the 'myspace' angles going on. I'd give her a 6.5/10 but those angles are decieving.
Naslectronical
09-02-2006, 09:59 PM
You guys astound me.
As hard as it is to believe, yes, there are indeed women who have trouble getting laid(I can think of several that I know off the top of my head). It's not just a problem that men face. There are plenty of women out there who will tell you that men have it easier when it comes to getting laid.
Etcetera
09-02-2006, 10:04 PM
You guys astound me.
As hard as it is to believe, yes, there are indeed women who have trouble getting laid(I can think of several that I know off the top of my head). It's not just a problem that men face. There are plenty of women out there who will tell you that men have it easier when it comes to getting laid.
100% bullshit. A woman (an ugly one at that) can put in minimal effort to get some, a lot of men can not do that.
Sweet Tooth
09-02-2006, 10:05 PM
She can get it.
SNAAAAKE
09-02-2006, 10:12 PM
lol @ super aids
aka ROLL CANCEL AIDS..there is nothing you can do to stop it :rofl:
Roxie
09-02-2006, 10:13 PM
100% bullshit. A woman (an ugly one at that) can put in minimal effort to get some, a lot of men can not do that.
well, looking at the article it looks like she's after a meaningful relationship, not just some quick sex.
Gumbercules
09-02-2006, 10:16 PM
then why is she so concerned about the sex part
Etcetera
09-02-2006, 10:18 PM
well, looking at the article it looks like she's after a meaningful relationship, not just some quick sex.
Understood, but she should have SAID THAT. Her ordeal isn't that she is still a virgin at almost 30 but that she hasn't had the relationship she wants in all this time.
But if it was stated along those lines, it takes out some of the impact and she wouldn't be getting flooded with 'applications' now. :rolleyes:
and yes beleive it or not their are celibent women out there, and its a shame too cause some of em look so damn good.
I don't doubt it at all, but it is most likely a choice where they are turning down dick, not just that no one is willing to fuck them.
L1qu1d
09-02-2006, 10:19 PM
^^ roxie you're not gonna be able to build with anyone on here don't even bother, more then half of SRK gets absolutley no pussy and its pretty odvious, ignorance rules everything around me.
and yes beleive it or not their are celibent women out there, and its a shame too cause some of em look so damn good. but it kinda turns me on that a woman can have such respect and willpower like that, just imagine how fresh....AYE
Will Gotti
09-02-2006, 10:21 PM
Fuck that. She can come to the Valley and I'll knock the dust off her ass and give her a good stickin'.
Shinto
09-02-2006, 10:25 PM
I'd fuck her but she do have ugly feature's nothing that the aegis reflector cant handle.
Se has Aids, to help her get sex roflly
Warpticon
09-02-2006, 10:28 PM
Ugly? What, y'all are all signed to modeling contracts? Some studly motherfuckers in here, huh? Just 10's, all of you.
Anway, million you missed
Course, I'm sure there's more to it than that.
Yeah.
She hasn't found a meaningful connection in 29 years. So, naturally, she's going to find it in two months with the help of a magazine so she can make an arbitrary deadline!
Stupid broad. (redundant, I know.) Hence why I wouldn't fuck her in a million years. Half-developed tripe like her has no right to near the glory of my penis.
TheMaidenMasha
09-02-2006, 10:31 PM
Unless shes going to fuck all applicants in a marathon of sex in all holes who the fuck cares?
Night
09-02-2006, 10:42 PM
She's probably met tons of guys that have wanted to sleep with her, but it's ultimately her that makes the decision to put out, and it's likely she decides not to at the last minute.
Ugly? What, y'all are all signed to modeling contracts? Some studly motherfuckers in here, huh? Just 10's, all of you.
A persons looks and/or sex life doesnt have anything to do with their views on a womans physical looks. Just because a guy thinks a girl is ugly doesnt mean they are super atractive themselves, it just means that in their opinion....shes ugly...and here i happen to agree.....i dont think id date her unless she had an awesome personality.
J-ride
09-02-2006, 10:50 PM
Yeah.
She hasn't found a meaningful connection in 29 years. So, naturally, she's going to find it in two months with the help of a magazine so she can make an arbitrary deadline!
:rofl: The logic is strong with this one.
ShinAkumax
09-02-2006, 11:02 PM
Meaningful connection is girl talk for " I'm very tight. " .
Lilman
09-02-2006, 11:07 PM
Meaningful connection is girl talk for " I'm very tight. " .
:rofl: :rofl:
Naslectronical
09-02-2006, 11:09 PM
100% bullshit. A woman (an ugly one at that) can put in minimal effort to get some, a lot of men can not do that.
There are a lot of women who can't do it as well, and on the other hand, there are plenty of men who would be considered by most to be as ugly as fuck who get laid pretty easily.
Further still, I've met plenty chicks who I'd consider to be pretty good looking who complained that they didn't get much or any action.
I'll give you some examples:
My cousin - She's not bad looking at all, but men look right through her. She's told me on many occasions that she may as well be invisible. She's gone out to clubs, bars, parties, etc, and no men have approached her all night.
Chick I used to work with - Guys would hit on her pretty often, but the problem was that she didn't find any of them attractive, which, needless to say, proved very fatal to her chances of getting any.
Chick I met in college - Was damn attractive, could have probably had any guy she wanted. Thing is, she didn't want a relationship, she just wanted sex, but she was afraid of being called the school slut because of that infamous idea that a guy who sleeps around is cool, but a chick who does it is a whore. This was enough to get in her way.
Point is, it's silly to make these kinds of blanket statements, no matter who makes them. The women out there who claim that men by default can get laid whenever they want are just as guilty. The people who make these statements, in my experience, are usually the ones who haven't been very fortunate with the opposite sex. That's understandable, but it's still pretty ridiculous.
How someone does with sex, dating, and relationships all depends on that individual.
aa_overmind
09-02-2006, 11:10 PM
I'd do her, I think she looks good!!
Its funny that everyone here that ranks a 5/10 want girls that are 10/10, you guys suck!!!
Everyone here is being brainwashed by Jessica Alba and shit and don't know how real girls look like!!!
A fuck is a fuck, at least she's not fat!!!
Jaldaboath
09-02-2006, 11:23 PM
Ugly? What, y'all are all signed to modeling contracts? Some studly motherfuckers in here, huh? Just 10's, all of you. I give her a 2. I'm a 14 so only girls >6 unless I'm very drunk.
And whether I'm atractive or not does not change my opinion on other people, that's just like hatin your neighborgh if he's richer than you. Don't pull strawmen Rox.
Her cheekbones look like the indentions of some horrified gremlin's fists as it tries to punch its way out of her face.
margalis
09-02-2006, 11:57 PM
It's funny how 95% of people rate themselves a 7 or higher. Strange how that math works out. Everyone in the world is above average looking!
This whole angle is probably totally fake. You haven't had a relationship or sex in 29 years so you - write to Jane magazine? It's probably just total bullshit, either an actress or a stock photo with a fabricated backstory.
What 29-year-old reads Jane anyway?
Stabby
09-03-2006, 12:19 AM
What 29-year-old reads Jane anyway?
Ones that can't get laid.
...sorry.
Night
09-03-2006, 12:26 AM
It's funny how 95% of people rate themselves a 7 or higher. Strange how that math works out. Everyone in the world is above average looking!
Jerry: Elaine, what percentage of people would you say are good looking?
Elaine: Twenty-five percent.
Jerry: Twenty-five percent, you say? No way! It's like 4 to 6 percent. It's a twenty to one shot.
Elaine: You're way off.
Jerry: Way off? Have you been to the motor vehicle bureau? It's like a leper colony down there.
Elaine: So what you are saying is that 90 to 95 percent of the population is undateable?
Jerry: UNDATEABLE!
Elaine: Then how are all these people getting together?
Jerry: Alcohol.
The Bucket Of Truth
09-03-2006, 12:28 AM
A fuck is a fuck, at least she's not fat!!!i always tell my friends "hey youre not batting for the australian cricket team"
Rioting Soul
09-03-2006, 03:09 AM
She's just looking for publicity. You know she isn't actually gonna answer any of those applicants.
Chick I met in college - Was damn attractive, could have probably had any guy she wanted. Thing is, she didn't want a relationship, she just wanted sex, but she was afraid of being called the school slut because of that infamous idea that a guy who sleeps around is cool, but a chick who does it is a whore. This was enough to get in her way.
If she could confide in you enough to tell you this then she must've been looking for you to relieve her, convinced that you wouldn't judge her like she thought others would. Tell me you obliged.
Taito
09-03-2006, 03:46 AM
Yeah she's not attractive.
I agree in part with Etcetera and Naslectronical.. her standards have likely reached grandiose proportions and the men that find her attractive haven't met her standards so far. She probably has a dogshit attitude on top of that.
I have no patience for people her age that still obsess over sex like they're still in grade school. She missed her tender, meaningful deflowering experience when everyone was doing it in their teens, and there had better be a damn good reason (you're absolutely disfigured, you're sick and you spent the greater part of your life in a hospital, abusive or otherwise unfortunate upbringing, religious conviction, etc.) that justifies her bitching about it now. Everyone her age has done it (and most of them are or have been married by now) and she has to deal with the fact that her eligibility pool has shrunk drastically. Buy an escort, lower your stuck up bullshit standards, whatever--and grow up instead of burdening us with your immature whining.
I hope this is a fake story but I've personally run into this situation a couple times.
Naslectronical
09-03-2006, 04:07 AM
If she could confide in you enough to tell you this then she must've been looking for you to relieve her, convinced that you wouldn't judge her like she thought others would. Tell me you obliged.
No, she did not find me attractive, as most women do not.
The Bucket Of Truth
09-03-2006, 04:11 AM
way to gay up the thread title septimus
outro
SNAAAAKE
09-03-2006, 05:25 AM
I have no patience for people her age that still obsess over sex like they're still in grade school. She missed her tender, meaningful deflowering experience when everyone was doing it in their teens, and there had better be a damn good reason (you're absolutely disfigured, you're sick and you spent the greater part of your life in a hospital, abusive or otherwise unfortunate upbringing, religious conviction, etc.) that justifies her bitching about it now. Everyone her age has done it (and most of them are or have been married by now) and she has to deal with the fact that her eligibility pool has shrunk drastically. Buy an escort, lower your stuck up bullshit standards, whatever--and grow up instead of burdening us with your immature whining.
RESPECT ! :cool:
Adam Warlock
09-03-2006, 06:09 AM
Ugly? What, y'all are all signed to modeling contracts? Some studly motherfuckers in here, huh? Just 10's, all of you.
Now matter how many times I read this type of statement, I'm always surprised by the sheer ignorance of it. The nature of opinion aside, why would you think this would be relative? How does the physical appeal of the person posting in any way, shape, or form affect the physical appeal of the woman being commented on? His face could be the spitting image of Lt. Worf, yet it still wouldn't make the woman any more attractive.
My cousin
This post is useless without pics.
Million
09-03-2006, 06:13 AM
But any lady who says they can't get some is a LIAR.See, this is specifically what I was getting at. There's simply no such thing as a woman that CAN'T get fucked. This is primarily because there are guys out there that will fuck anything. There are even some guys who don't really need her to be alive to hit it. Also, srk-brand exaggerated criticism aside, it's not like she's butt-ugly, imo. Like some others said...I'd say she's plain, and potentially moderately cute.
Again, there is no such thing as a woman that can't get DICKED. She could be a burn victim with no limbs and a glass eye....somewhere out there will be a guy who will think "...eh, yeah...I'd hit."
yeah, and of course she's doing it for attention/book deals/career/whatever.
Golden Dragon
09-03-2006, 07:37 AM
so she is from new york. I'd give her a piece of TEH SNAAAAAAKE ! :devil:
(yeah I fuck ugly chicks..sue me)
ROFL
Hunter D
09-03-2006, 07:51 AM
The only reason a women can't get fucked is because she chooses not to get fucked. Every women gets hit on. Some don't realize what is happening or they just aren't interested in the guy hitting on them.
I've known broads that wished they looked half as good as her that have men. The problem with her is that she is probably aiming to high, waiting for the perfect man.
Azrael
09-03-2006, 08:04 AM
Million's right. Any woman who says they can't get laid is tripping on some serious bullshit. They create all sorts of excuses and reasons why, but ultimately it is bullshit.
I have a friend who is 27-ish and still a virgin (last I knew anyway). This girl is horny as all hell, but was all hung up on the "I want it to be special" bullshit. She also kept falling in love with assholes, and she'd want to wait and make them jump through hoops before putting out, and since they were assholes they'd give up on her and go fuck some other chick, leaving her heartbroken.
As for the other excuses....
My cousin - She's not bad looking at all, but men look right through her. She's told me on many occasions that she may as well be invisible. She's gone out to clubs, bars, parties, etc, and no men have approached her all night.
See, why do men have to approach her? If she sees a guy she likes, why can't she strike up the conversation with him? If you want something...go out and get it, right? I want a cheeseburger but I sure don't expect one to just show up on my doorstep while I patiently wait for it.
Chick I used to work with - Guys would hit on her pretty often, but the problem was that she didn't find any of them attractive, which, needless to say, proved very fatal to her chances of getting any.
Well then, maybe she needs to check her standards.
I don't know about your friend, but all the women I used to know who said this...the guys were perfectly nice, decently attractive guys, but she just didn't feel "it" so it was a no-go. What in the world is "it" anyway?
But again, if what she wants isn't coming to her, why doesn't she go out and get what she wants?
Chick I met in college - Was damn attractive, could have probably had any guy she wanted. Thing is, she didn't want a relationship, she just wanted sex, but she was afraid of being called the school slut because of that infamous idea that a guy who sleeps around is cool, but a chick who does it is a whore. This was enough to get in her way.
This I can buy somewhat...there is still the double standard hanging over women's heads.
But, I think times have changed somewhat. And, I knew plenty of girls in college who got their freak on and no one thought they were whores.
I live in Japan at the moment...and it's funny, cause the foreign women here don't get any play unless they go out and get it themselves (cause Japanese men will never approach a foreign woman, and foreign men are too busy chasing Japanese pussy). There are women who realize that, accept that, and go out and bag them a foreign or Japanese guy and get laid happily. And then there are girls who throw out all these excuses and then whine about having a stale sex life.
FallingEdge
09-03-2006, 09:05 AM
The real question here is, which SRKer is gonna step up and submit a picture?
Super Warrior
09-03-2006, 09:29 AM
Hmmm wonder if i should do something like that. I'm 24 now and never even had a first date before. Won't be long before i'm 30 and a virgin.
Yup i've pretty much given up completly on that part of "life".
white shadow
09-03-2006, 09:37 AM
I don't know about your friend, but all the women I used to know who said this...the guys were perfectly nice, decently attractive guys, but she just didn't feel "it" so it was a no-go. What in the world is "it" anyway?
Pheromones?
Million
09-03-2006, 09:47 AM
Hmmm wonder if i should do something like that. I'm 24 now and never even had a first date before. Won't be long before i'm 30 and a virgin.
Yup i've pretty much given up completly on that part of "life".Come on, anyone can get a simple "date"...even me. That's not because it means anything...it's more because most women will say "yes" to a so-called "date" simply so they can at least get a free trip to the movies, or a free lunch or dinner, free whatever....then of course they back out later and call it a "nice time hanging out with a good friend" or whatever...or they'll allow themselves to think of it as actually a date, and simply FZ™ at a later time. Just get one of these situations, and lie to yourself that it was actually a date, and you'll have at least accomplished that much. Anyway, it is of course because they're mostly just self-centered trash like that. It would be interesting to calculate the average amount of times a woman gets to eat completely free of charge in life because of a "date". I'd love to see the stats on things like this....like how many times a typical american woman gets free trips to the movies, or whatever....because of the "date". It's all a less financially sound, euphemized form of prostitution, basically. Really, I bet those date "benefits" add up to a lot over a typical lifespan. How many times in life does a man get to eat free? Later in life...perhaps once a year when you have a kid, and they take you out to eat for Father's Day....and that's a *maybe*.
oh, and as for the broad this thread was about in the first place, hell yeah I'd hit it. I saw her on that Headline News show, and she looks better in video than in the pictures.
Yasashiyama
09-03-2006, 10:43 AM
Come on, anyone can get a simple "date"...even me. That's not because it means anything...it's more because most women will say "yes" to a so-called "date" simply so they can at least get a free trip to the movies, or a free lunch or dinner, free whatever....then of course they back out later and call it a "nice time hanging out with a good friend" or whatever...or they'll allow themselves to think of it as actually a date, and simply FZ™ at a later time. Just get one of these situations, and lie to yourself that it was actually a date, and you'll have at least accomplished that much. Anyway, it is of course because they're mostly just self-centered trash like that. It would be interesting to calculate the average amount of times a woman gets to eat completely free of charge in life because of a "date". I'd love to see the stats on things like this....like how many times a typical american woman gets free trips to the movies, or whatever....because of the "date". It's all a less financially sound, euphemized form of prostitution, basically. Really, I bet those date "benefits" add up to a lot over a typical lifespan. How many times in life does a man get to eat free? Later in life...perhaps once a year when you have a kid, and they take you out to eat for Father's Day....and that's a *maybe*.
I happen to have a friend who admits that she only goes on "dates" to get free shit. Not only that but she's proud of it too. Then she will only go out with a guy a second time or have sex with him if he happens to be moderately good looking. And she wonders why she can't keep a meaninglyful relationship for more than a month.
P.S. The only problem she has physically is her pimple scars all over her face. Personality wise she's a bit condensending. If she could fix those two things I'm sure she could find a relationship that's beyond money.
Shade
09-03-2006, 10:53 AM
I'll pop that cherry for her, and let my love go BANG BANG BANG.
EvilRyuX
09-03-2006, 10:56 AM
Let's look at some of the contestants in the ''I want my virginity gone'' publicity stunt game!
Contestant Number - 1 - Extra from Queer Eye for the Straight Guy (http://www.janemag.com/magazine/slideshows/2006/08/28/SarahPoll2b?slide=5)
Contestant Number - 2 - Mr. Wrinkles A.K.A I looked like I just dropped out of High School because my drug habits were in the way (http://www.janemag.com/magazine/slideshows/2006/08/28/SarahPoll2b?slide=6)
Contestant Number - 3 - :confused: (http://www.janemag.com/magazine/slideshows/2006/08/28/SarahPoll2b?slide=18) (Click the Face)
Naslectronical
09-03-2006, 10:56 AM
Million's right. Any woman who says they can't get laid is tripping on some serious bullshit. They create all sorts of excuses and reasons why, but ultimately it is bullshit.............
..............See, why do men have to approach her? If she sees a guy she likes, why can't she strike up the conversation with him? If you want something...go out and get it, right? I want a cheeseburger but I sure don't expect one to just show up on my doorstep while I patiently wait for it.
She's done it and been turned down or completely ignored once another chick shows up.
Well then, maybe she needs to check her standards.
It's not a rental application. In order for someone to have sex with another person, an attraction has to exist. If it doesn't, then that's pretty much all there is to it. Who a person is and isn't attracted to is hardwired into them at birth.
I don't know about your friend, but all the women I used to know who said this...the guys were perfectly nice, decently attractive guys, but she just didn't feel "it" so it was a no-go. What in the world is "it" anyway?
Again, she didn't find them attractive.
But again, if what she wants isn't coming to her, why doesn't she go out and get what she wants?
Because what she wants doesn't seem to be attracted to her. We went out together a few times, and once I actually told her the same thing you did. No only did she tell me that she does approach men, but she did it a few times one night and all the guys brushed her off sooner or later.
This I can buy somewhat...there is still the double standard hanging over women's heads.
But, I think times have changed somewhat. And, I knew plenty of girls in college who got their freak on and no one thought they were whores.
And yet the opposite still holds true in many cases. It happened to my sister when she was at college. She did it and got the reputation as the school slut.
This is primarily because there are guys out there that will fuck anything.
Just as there are women out there who will fuck anything.
Seriously, everything the two of you are saying can be applied to men not being able to get laid as well, and as I've stated, there are many women out there who believe it's bullshit that a man can't laid whenever he feels like it, and that they indeed have it easier.
Either way, what you're saying as well as what they're saying is nothing but blanket opinions in which you're trying to group all men and women in together.. You seem to think that what you've experienced applies to all when it doesn't. Getting laid like crazy, getting laid moderately, or not getting laid at all depends on the particular individual.
and as I've stated, there are many women out there who believe it's bullshit that a man can't laid whenever he feels like it, and that they indeed have it easier.
see, this is where I am perplexed. Why in the fucking shit blasting from an asshole, would a woman think a GUY can get laid whenever he wants??? what thought process is used to come up with this opinion???
i mean there is some thought process behind why a woman can get laid whenever she wants, you can put up many arguements...
but a guy???
im outi
Roberth
white shadow
09-03-2006, 11:48 AM
Just as there are women out there who will fuck anything.
Seriously, everything the two of you are saying can be applied to men not being able to get laid as well, and as I've stated, there are many women out there who believe it's bullshit that a man can't laid whenever he feels like it, and that they indeed have it easier.
Either way, what you're saying as well as what they're saying is nothing but blanket opinions in which you're trying to group all men and women in together.. You seem to think that what you've experienced applies to all when it doesn't. Getting laid like crazy, getting laid moderately, or not getting laid at all depends on the particular individual.
I think attempting to show minor exceptions to a rule is just as bad as making blanket statements.
Just because you've met girls that say it is hard for them to get dates or that it should be easy for men [in general] to get laid does not automatically make it true. It seems you are attempting to level a scale with a bunch of grapes and a watermelon.
Just based on how society works you can see that sexual desire is skewed toward a certain sex. If getting laid was easy for men, prostitution wouldn't be considered "the world's oldest profession" because technically no man would need to pay for something that should be so easy to obtain.
Biologically speaking, men crave for sex more and women inherently seek for a suitable man for reproduction and child-rearing, whether it is a concious thought or not.
Naslectronical
09-03-2006, 12:50 PM
I think attempting to show minor exceptions to a rule is just as bad as making blanket statements.
How do you know that it's a minor exception? And what rule are you talking about?
Have you met all men and women in the world?
Just because you've met girls that say it is hard for them to get dates or that it should be easy for men [in general] to get laid does not automatically make it true. It seems you are attempting to level a scale with a bunch of grapes and a watermelon.
I'm not attempting to level anything. I'm simply stating that you can't apply the same standard of that particular sex. My only point has always been that it's an individual issue.
Just based on how society works you can see that sexual desire is skewed toward a certain sex. If getting laid was easy for men, prostitution wouldn't be considered "the world's oldest profession" because technically no man would need to pay for something that should be so easy to obtain.
Or maybe it has to do with men historically viewing women as nothing but objects that can be bought, used, and disposed of at will. I'm pretty sure that if it were the other way around and women had always dominated society, male prostitution would be more prominent.
And I hope you can realize that women desire to have sex just as much men do. In order for a species to survive, both sexes must have the desire, and they do.
Biologically speaking, men crave for sex more and women inherently seek for a suitable man for reproduction and child-rearing, whether it is a concious thought or not.
Even though this really has nothing to do with anything I've said, I hope you can realize that women desire to have sex just as much men do. Since you want to bring up biology, in order for a species to survive, both sexes must have the desire, and they do. Women just tend to be less open about it, but that is changing.
The fact is that both sexes have their advantages and disadvantages and both have their troubles when it comes to sex, dating, and relationships. There are women who claim the other side has it easier just as their are men who claim the other side has it easier. There are men who will fuck anything and there are women who will fuck anything. This should clue you in to the fact that it depends on who you talk to. In other words, the individual.
Bottom line, it's all opinion. You guys say women have it easier. Others will tell you men have it easier. For some reason, guys like you, Azrael, and Million think that your opinions are written in stone because of your experiences, but when someone has a different one, you want to write it off as bullshit because it doesn't fit your experiences. So why does your opinion mean more than theirs?
Super Warrior
09-03-2006, 01:10 PM
Come on, anyone can get a simple "date"...even me. That's not because it means anything...it's more because most women will say "yes" to a so-called "date" simply so they can at least get a free trip to the movies, or a free lunch or dinner, free whatever....then of course they back out later and call it a "nice time hanging out with a good friend" or whatever...or they'll allow themselves to think of it as actually a date, and simply FZ™ at a later time. Just get one of these situations, and lie to yourself that it was actually a date, and you'll have at least accomplished that much. Anyway, it is of course because they're mostly just self-centered trash like that. It would be interesting to calculate the average amount of times a woman gets to eat completely free of charge in life because of a "date". I'd love to see the stats on things like this....like how many times a typical american woman gets free trips to the movies, or whatever....because of the "date". It's all a less financially sound, euphemized form of prostitution, basically. Really, I bet those date "benefits" add up to a lot over a typical lifespan. How many times in life does a man get to eat free? Later in life...perhaps once a year when you have a kid, and they take you out to eat for Father's Day....and that's a *maybe*.
oh, and as for the broad this thread was about in the first place, hell yeah I'd hit it. I saw her on that Headline News show, and she looks better in video than in the pictures.
Not me, i couldn't get a "date" if my life depended on it.
Even if i HAD the money to take them out somewhere nice.
Super Warrior
09-03-2006, 01:18 PM
see, this is where I am perplexed. Why in the fucking shit blasting from an asshole, would a woman think a GUY can get laid whenever he wants??? what thought process is used to come up with this opinion???
i mean there is some thought process behind why a woman can get laid whenever she wants, you can put up many arguements...
but a guy???
im outi
Roberth
Yup i'm living proof. I'm a fairly "normal" looking guy i guess, i've got all my limbs, both eyes, not bald, no diesases or disabilities, and i'm tall(6'3"), etc. I've got a bit of a weight problem but nothing too bad, as i diet & exercise 24/7 in my efforts to improve upon myself.
And i could'nt get "laid" even if i walked into a brothel, with hundred dollar bills hanging out of my pants.
Silentness!
09-03-2006, 01:55 PM
Life would never be the same without SRK. :rofl:
I'm speechless; I have nothing to add to this thread.
rsigley
09-03-2006, 01:57 PM
i heard her on the radio (JV and Elvis) from the way she talks I can tell why no one has slept with her yet
felineki
09-03-2006, 02:13 PM
Wow, and I thought I was pathetic.
white shadow
09-03-2006, 03:22 PM
How do you know that it's a minor exception? And what rule are you talking about?
Have you met all men and women in the world?
I'm not attempting to level anything. I'm simply stating that you can't apply the same standard of that particular sex. My only point has always been that it's an individual issue.
Humans are social creatures so individual issues have a broader scope when dealing with a population, which is the argument at hand.
You have not met all the men and women in the world, however you also feel that you can make a solid analysis on how women "want sex as often as men" not because of statistics but because of your personal experience from dealing with certain women.
I am not going to say that my opinion is some grand truth that permeates throughout all the world, but through multiple obvservations of multiple men making many observations of their own experiences it is clear the the male/female dynamic is unevenly yolked. (I will discuss that shortly.)
Or maybe it has to do with men historically viewing women as nothing but objects that can be bought, used, and disposed of at will. I'm pretty sure that if it were the other way around and women had always dominated society, male prostitution would be more prominent.
And I hope you can realize that women desire to have sex just as much men do. In order for a species to survive, both sexes must have the desire, and they do.
Even though this really has nothing to do with anything I've said, I hope you can realize that women desire to have sex just as much men do. Since you want to bring up biology, in order for a species to survive, both sexes must have the desire, and they do. Women just tend to be less open about it, but that is changing.
You're speculating that if our society was dominated by women that there would be male prostitution. However, you seem to pass over something very important- why the bulk of civilization is mostly male-dominanted. The answer to this is simply sexual selection, or rather the control of it.
The reason why the male/female mating game is skewed is simply because it has to. In order for the best genes to be passed to the most viable offspring, the most physical appealing male has to sought after. Statistically it is impossible that every male in a population would be chosen for this simple fact.
In nature, and in more gender equal societies, women make the choice of who they want to mate with. No matter if it is a housefly or a capybara females make the choice, and that is the reason why sexual selection is so successful.
Now some time in human history, male humans, being outright more intelligent than all other male animals on the planet, made a decision (whether it was concious or subconcious is up for debate) in which women would not be at the helm of their mini-societies. Instead they will be seen as reproductive conquests which could be bartered off, the precursor of modern marriage. Since domains and resources were now just as essential as sex, sexual selection became more vague.
With the advent of agriculture, prostitution was created as a means of men, many of whom could not afford to support multiple wives to subconciously procreate with many women and do so without excessive travelling (because agriculture allowed men to stay in a city or town) and using money or goods for services.
Eventually this evolved into a male dominated society in which women were treated as second-class persons whose sole purpose is for reproduction and maintaining domestic homeostasis.
Fortunately, this changed over thousands of years with the birth of modern civilization, (at least in some areas) and sexual selection is becoming less cloudy because of that fact. Women now have the oppurtunity of having sex with men they completely find appealing and even having multiple suitors. Also, because religion, which created the groundwork for marriage is now not so relevant in modern culture today, there is significantly less control over the amount destiny of women.
The fact is that both sexes have their advantages and disadvantages and both have their troubles when it comes to sex, dating, and relationships. There are women who claim the other side has it easier just as their are men who claim the other side has it easier. There are men who will fuck anything and there are women who will fuck anything. This should clue you in to the fact that it depends on who you talk to. In other words, the individual.
Bottom line, it's all opinion. You guys say women have it easier. Others will tell you men have it easier. For some reason, guys like you, Azrael, and Million think that your opinions are written in stone because of your experiences, but when someone has a different one, you want to write it off as bullshit because it doesn't fit your experiences. So why does your opinion mean more than theirs?
I would gladly agree if it wasn't for this wonderful hormone known as testosterone. Unlike women who need more chemical and mental stimuli needed for arousal, (due to having significantly less testosterone levels than males) men have a larger amount of testosterone and work more on a visual basis (sans pheromones) and have to be more ready to mate at anytime because women are not fertile at everytime.
To say that women want sex as much as men is to completely ignore the biological reasons of why we all want sex in the first place, hormones. That isn't to say some women can't make a concious decision to have sex all the time (birth control/ sexual selection makes it much easier) but that the basis for them wanting sex is more for gratification/liberation than for subconcious reproduction.
I'm not even going to get into the role of alcohol and clubs. *snore*
EDIT: A few cultures, such as Mongolian culture, women have had a domineering role in their society but don't seem to focused on male prostitiution or adopting masculine roles.
Team Mormons!
Rioting Soul
09-03-2006, 03:53 PM
And, I knew plenty of girls in college who got their freak on and no one thought they were whores.
Except for the other girls in hushed gossip.
dialupsucky
09-03-2006, 03:56 PM
Wow I have the same problem as this girl! cept I never even hold girls hand before... ._. Anyone wanna help me out? Of course not..... ugly... chicks..... That doesnt count.
Naslectronical
09-03-2006, 04:03 PM
Humans are social creatures so individual issues have a broader scope when dealing with a population, which is the argument at hand.
Broader does not translate to "all encompassing", which seems to be the attitude in this thread.
You have not met all the men and women in the world, however you also feel that you can make a solid analysis on how women "want sex as often as men" not because of statistics but because of your personal experience from dealing with certain women.
I'm simply acknowledging that women have sex drives just as do men. Maybe I was wrong in saying it the way that I did because there's no way to measure it, but I digress.
I am not going to say that my opinion is some grand truth that permeates throughout all the world, but through multiple obvservations of multiple men making many observations of their own experiences it is clear the the male/female dynamic is unevenly yolked. (I will discuss that shortly.)
So you're just going to disregard the multiple observations of multiple men AND women that would suggest otherwise?
Very long soliloquy on biology and societal development
We're talking about human beings here, not dogs or rabbits or elephants. Human beings are not nearly as bound by their instincts
You're oversimplifying things. You're trying to make it seem as though it's all simple math and science, but it's not, it's much more complicated. Even if you could go out and study every human being on the planet it would mean nothing because you can't take every factor and variable into account.
In the end, it's all opinion and will differ depending who you talk to and what they do and have experienced, so once again, we get back to the fact that it's all about the individual.
white shadow
09-03-2006, 04:17 PM
We're talking about human beings here, not dogs or rabbits or elephants. Human beings are not nearly as bound by their instincts
You're oversimplifying things. You're trying to make it seem as though it's all simple math and science, but it's not, it's much more complicated. Even if you could go out and study every human being on the planet it would mean nothing because you can't take every factor and variable into account.
In the end, it's all opinion and will differ depending who you talk to and what they do and have experienced, so once again, we get back to the fact that it's all about the individual.
This is the only thing I'm replying to, I think you fail to realize that peoples' natural biological tendecies are not meant to be noticed easily. Our entire existance is based on the premise that we will make more of ourselves. For example, people might say they go to clubs to hang out and they genuinely might mean that, but subconciously people go to social gatherings because of the strong but silent need to reproduce.
Whether you choose to accept this is up to you, but I've said what I needed to say.:pleased:
Nick T.
09-03-2006, 04:26 PM
Let's look at some of the contestants in the ''I want my virginity gone'' publicity stunt game!
Contestant Number - 1 - Extra from Queer Eye for the Straight Guy (http://www.janemag.com/magazine/slideshows/2006/08/28/SarahPoll2b?slide=5)
Contestant Number - 2 - Mr. Wrinkles A.K.A I looked like I just dropped out of High School because my drug habits were in the way (http://www.janemag.com/magazine/slideshows/2006/08/28/SarahPoll2b?slide=6)
Contestant Number - 3 - :confused: (http://www.janemag.com/magazine/slideshows/2006/08/28/SarahPoll2b?slide=18) (Click the Face)
Number 2 is the best one IMO. The other 2 are waiting to come out of the closet.
Mario Lemieux!
09-03-2006, 04:53 PM
QUICK! Somebody submit a Brian Peppers or Sagat picture!! Or that one time-traveling mullet guy!
I have penis! WHO WANT HOTDOG!?
SNAAAAKE
09-03-2006, 05:14 PM
Wow I have the same problem as this girl! cept I never even hold girls hand before... ._. Anyone wanna help me out? Of course not..... ugly... chicks..... That doesnt count.
once again, weren't you a "model" or some sort ?? are you even TRYING ?? just sign up for myspace and start talking to random girls. I dont see why its so hard..online dating isnt as bad as it looks..trust me on that. I am not saying you will get some rightway but nothing will ever happen if you dont try.
catchafire
09-03-2006, 05:21 PM
This is soo stupid. I'd bet there are more male virgins out there about to turn 30 than their counterparts. I bet if a guy tried this stunt, he'd be called sexist.
KungfuJoe
09-03-2006, 05:52 PM
Yeah.
She hasn't found a meaningful connection in 29 years. So, naturally, she's going to find it in two months with the help of a magazine so she can make an arbitrary deadline!
This ring to true here, the only other thing I can think of is having very high standards. Believe me you will never get anywhere with that one.
KFJ
Million
09-03-2006, 06:09 PM
I still think it's silly to see the whole thing as anywhere near equal.
typical male from 13--30. = there are various points in life where, yes, some girl wants to hit it.
typical female from 13--30 = every single year of her life...every day, there are multiple guys wanting to hit that. There's really no significant "dry periods", as with the male. It doesn't matter if she's fat and ugly, or even missing a few limbs....it doesn't even matter if she's a retarded person, or has Down Syndrome, etc. A "low point" for her might be a period of a few months were there is ONLY 1 guy wanting to hit.
*The guy goes out and tries, and hopes to get laid. A woman on the other hand...goes out and chooses when it will happen. The only thing that could possibly get in the way are her own foolish standards....like if she's a 2 out of 10, but thinking she's worthy of a guy that's easily soap opera hunk status....at which point, it becomes obvious that she deserves the patented "Nigga Please". Seriously, what low-tier guy could honestly say the same? Shit, what AVERAGE status guy could say the same? PERHAPS so if you want to count jailbait, as they want to fuck an older guy regardless of most factors....but if we're going to include illegal/immoral things as "options", you may as well say (regular) rape counts too.
perhaps it is better said this way...if a woman "can't"(haha..I can't even say that with a straight face) get laid...it is more than likely because of her own ridiculous standards, and perhaps she needs to be a bit more realistic. If a guy...specifically average to low-tier status...can't get laid...it's most likely not entirely his fault. He may be putting in the work, and doing things mostly "correct"....but simply getting no results at this time.
dialupsucky
09-03-2006, 07:06 PM
once again, weren't you a "model" or some sort ?? are you even TRYING ?? just sign up for myspace and start talking to random girls. I dont see why its so hard..online dating isnt as bad as it looks..trust me on that. I am not saying you will get some rightway but nothing will ever happen if you dont try.
yeaaaaa i guuuuuuuuuuuuesssssssssss but I suck and stuff... And I cant try cuz yea umm I suck and stuff...
Biolink
09-03-2006, 07:22 PM
I'd hit it.
Super Warrior
09-03-2006, 07:47 PM
This is soo stupid. I'd bet there are more male virgins out there about to turn 30 than their counterparts.
Speaking as a 24 yr old male virgin who, chances are high, may be eventually turning 30 with the same status.
I agree with that statement.
TheDarkPhoenix
09-03-2006, 08:06 PM
That chick aint ugly, she's average....
Even me myself can say that.
On a side note, women look in the tupidest places for love, and meaningful relationship, like Personal's Sex sites and stuff like this. While at the same time, not wanting to have sex or wanting a kind or "real" guy.
To make it simple women aren't to bright alot of times. The thing is she'll prob find a average guy thats rich off all this.
Naslectronical
09-04-2006, 01:35 AM
I still think it's silly to see the whole thing as anywhere near equal.
typical male from 13--30. = there are various points in life where, yes, some girl wants to hit it.
typical female from 13--30 = every single year of her life...every day, there are multiple guys wanting to hit that. There's really no significant "dry periods", as with the male. It doesn't matter if she's fat and ugly, or even missing a few limbs....it doesn't even matter if she's a retarded person, or has Down Syndrome, etc. A "low point" for her might be a period of a few months were there is ONLY 1 guy wanting to hit.
*The guy goes out and tries, and hopes to get laid. A woman on the other hand...goes out and chooses when it will happen. The only thing that could possibly get in the way are her own foolish standards....like if she's a 2 out of 10, but thinking she's worthy of a guy that's easily soap opera hunk status....at which point, it becomes obvious that she deserves the patented "Nigga Please". Seriously, what low-tier guy could honestly say the same? Shit, what AVERAGE status guy could say the same? PERHAPS so if you want to count jailbait, as they want to fuck an older guy regardless of most factors....but if we're going to include illegal/immoral things as "options", you may as well say (regular) rape counts too.
perhaps it is better said this way...if a woman "can't"(haha..I can't even say that with a straight face) get laid...it is more than likely because of her own ridiculous standards, and perhaps she needs to be a bit more realistic. If a guy...specifically average to low-tier status...can't get laid...it's most likely not entirely his fault. He may be putting in the work, and doing things mostly "correct"....but simply getting no results at this time.
I never said that everyone was equal; however, what makes them unequal is what makes up that particular person. What you are using is a false dichotomy. You're making it seem as though the only thing that comes into play when someone is trying to get laid/have a relationship is their sex when this is obviously not true.
For every women you consider to be ugly that can get laid, I'm sure I could find a male counterpart. For all the men out there who will fuck any woman in sight, I can find a woman who will fuck any man in sight. For every man who claims that women have it easier, I can find a woman who thinks that men have it easier.
I don't mean to offend you, but your posts as well as the title of this thread reek of bitterness and frustration because, by your own accounts, haven't had the best luck when it comes to women. I understand how it feels, but some of the stuff you'd said here is rather short-sighted, and in some cases, downright silly. You claim that one's chances when it comes to getting laid all depend on that person's sex despite the fact that there are so many other factors that you've chosen to blatantly ignore. You say that if a woman's having trouble, then her standards are too high and that she should lower them despite the fact that a person can't change what they are and aren't attracted to. If a woman wants to get laid but her only real "prospects " are men whom she does not find to be attractive, then it shouldn't take much to see that this is a problem. Not only this, but a lot of men(or women in the opposite situation) would find it insulting and patronizing if some chick were to do this, because it's basically the same as saying "I wouldn't normally give you the time of day, but since I can't get what I really want, I'm going to move it down to a lower notch and settle for you knowing that you'll accept it because you're lower quality and can't do any better."
Again, no offense, but you seem to have deep personal issues regarding women. You say that when they can't get laid, it's bullshit and it's their fault because they're standards are too high, but then when a man can't get laid, he's doing everything right but it's just that women aren't giving him a chance. You seem to want to blame women for everything. Not only are you saying that it's all their fault when they have bad luck with sex/dating/relationships, you also want to blame them for men's problems. You act as though your thoughts about women having it easier are sacred laws written in stone and you want to write it off as bullshit when people tell you that women have their fair share of troubles as well. Sorry dude, but that's just flat-out ignorant.
Athanasy
09-04-2006, 06:54 AM
Take my word for it.
Snaaaake will fuck some gnarly ass chicks.
But for every eight of them he gets like one superstar.
Million
09-04-2006, 07:21 AM
You say that if a woman's having trouble, then her standards are too high and that she should lower them despite the fact that a person can't change what they are and aren't attracted to.It should be easy to understand what "standards are too high" means whether you're referring to a man or woman. Men typically learn early on to not wait on someone who is absolutely perfect in every possible way...whereas your average woman tends to have some long, ridiculous list of demands, and you know good and well that if you don't meet one or more of those *requirements*, she will cancel everything at any point...and the man has to just move on. Of course it's no big deal for her, especially early in life, as they usually have a line of potential "suitors". I understand you can't change what you're attracted to, but you CAN be at least realistic about certain "standards"...for instance, is it realistic that some average to low tier woman should hold out for a guy that looks like The Rock, has a 6-figure paying job, drives a particular car, speaks in a certain way, doesn't smoke, has no kids, is a perfect gentleman most of the time, but has some bad-boy qualities(of course), is tall, can dance, doesn't "speak too white", can play an instrument, can speak at least 3 languages, will never even look at another woman, loves jazz music, is always down with "The Black Opinion" in terms of politics(and interracial dating..and religion.), is at least a certain height, walks a certain way, no previous marriages, no annoying friends, no "geeky" hobbies, etc. etc. etfuckingcetera. You know good and damn well that most women go through life with this long ass list of DEMANDS. Every guy I've known has seen this. Shit, women themselves DON'T EVEN DENY THIS. In fact, bring up the issue, and they'll gladly give you their "list of requirements"(probably in defense mode...they always think they're different from other girls of course) Their "lists" start out fairly reasonable, but they drift off into small, silly bullshit like "he must walk a certain way", or "ooh don't get with him girl...he has a chipped toenail." or "ooh, can't get with him...he had spaghetti and broccoli on his plate, and he ate the broccoli BEFORE the spaghetti! What's wrong with him!!!" No, what's wrong with you, you stupid piece of feces-encrusted cunt? Goddamn I just want to cut the head off a bitch like that) Compare this to the "standards" we as men typically have:
1. Hot. -(not even PERFECTION oh my god Beyonce in a schoolgirl outfit!" hot either. A 5 or 6 will do, basically. Most of us wise up at some point in life and stop wasting time ONLY trying to get a 10.)
2. Reasonably intelligent(and this can be disregarded if all we really want is to hit it.)
3. Sexually open (for whatever perversion/fetish we happen to have. Again, this one can be downgraded too, if we're just looking to "hit it and quit", as James Brown would say.)
*really, it applies to both sides anyway. If you waste life holding out for an absolute perfect 10, you WILL be alone for a very long time...possibly for the rest of life. You'll always be attracted to 10s, naturally....but "changing standards" means being realistic about things.
"If a woman wants to get laid but her only real "prospects " are men whom she does not find to be attractive, then it shouldn't take much to see that this is a problem."Man or woman, if ALL you find "attractive" are 10s, you're destined for some serious disappointment in life. I was just saying it's best to be realistic. Go for the 5s, the 6s, the 7s....maybe even a 4. Anyone that has a ridiculous standard, such as "I only fuck with broads who look exactly like Halle"...they're just stupid, plain and simple. This results in situations where you're ignoring a perfectly good "6.5" that may want to hook up with you.
L1qu1d
09-04-2006, 07:22 AM
^and for every four comes an STD ;], and snaake is right i slept on the internet for a long time and thought it was "gay" and would be filled with just abunch of dude imposters, myspace changed ALL of that...new technology take advantadge of it. and its nice cause you get to know them a lot before you actually meet, so you can skip a lot of the getting to know you shit and just ball out.
It should be easy to understand what "standards are too high" means whether you're referring to a man or woman. Men typically learn early on to not wait on someone who is absolutely perfect in every possible way...whereas your average woman tends to have some long, ridiculous list of demands, and you know good and well that if you don't meet one or more of those *requirements*, she will cancel everything at any point...and the man has to just move on. Of course it's no big deal for her, especially early in life, as they usually have a line of potential "suitors". I understand you can't change what you're attracted to, but you CAN be at least realistic about certain "standards"...for instance, is it realistic that some average to low tier woman should hold out for a guy that looks like The Rock, has a 6-figure paying job, drives a particular car, speaks in a certain way, doesn't smoke, has no kids, is a perfect gentleman most of the time, but has some bad-boy qualities(of course), is tall, can dance, doesn't "speak too white", can play an instrument, can speak at least 3 languages, will never even look at another woman, loves jazz music, is always down with "The Black Opinion" in terms of politics(and interracial dating..and religion.), is at least a certain height, walks a certain way, no previous marriages, no annoying friends, no "geeky" hobbies, etc. etc. etfuckingcetera. You know good and damn well that most women go through life with this long ass list of DEMANDS. Every guy I've known has seen this. Shit, women themselves DON'T EVEN DENY THIS. In fact, bring up the issue, and they'll gladly give you their "list of requirements"(probably in defense mode...they always think they're different from other girls of course) Their "lists" start out fairly reasonable, but they drift off into small, silly bullshit like "he must walk a certain way", or "ooh don't get with him girl...he has a chipped toenail." or "ooh, can't get with him...he had spaghetti and broccoli on his plate, and he ate the broccoli BEFORE the spaghetti! What's wrong with him!!!" No, what's wrong with you, you stupid piece of feces-encrusted cunt? Goddamn I just want to cut the head off a bitch like that) Compare this to the "standards" we as men typically have:
1. Hot. -(not even PERFECTION oh my god Beyonce in a schoolgirl outfit!" hot either. A 5 or 6 will do, basically. Most of us wise up at some point in life and stop wasting time ONLY trying to get a 10.)
2. Reasonably intelligent(and this can be disregarded if all we really want is to hit it.)
3. Sexually open (for whatever perversion/fetish we happen to have. Again, this one can be downgraded too, if we're just looking to "hit it and quit", as James Brown would say.)
*really, it applies to both sides anyway. If you waste life holding out for an absolute perfect 10, you WILL be alone for a very long time...possibly for the rest of life. You'll always be attracted to 10s, naturally....but "changing standards" means being realistic about things.
Man or woman, if ALL you find "attractive" are 10s, you're destined for some serious disappointment in life. I was just saying it's best to be realistic. Go for the 5s, the 6s, the 7s....maybe even a 4. Anyone that has a ridiculous standard, such as "I only fuck with broads who look exactly like Halle"...they're just stupid, plain and simple. This results in situations where you're ignoring a perfectly good "6.5" that may want to hook up with you.
see, this is where it gets watery...sure some might have rediculous standards, BUT, I have dated girls pretty seriously where I really wasn't their type. even my current girlfriend, I am not really her type.
you ask how do I know this? I look at past boyfriends pictures and I have met them, I am like a complete 360 from them...so I guess my point is even if a girl has standards, or rediculous standards, there is still something you can do to make them like you, you just have to find it...
im outi
Roberth
buyproduct
09-04-2006, 12:19 PM
Since when did fucking a virgin get popular. If your gonna fuck fuck someones who knows how to fuck. A girl that does that thing with her hips and is telling you where to hit it. Why would you want to fuck a rookie that will limit your experience and complain of pain and will more than likely tell you slow down so many times that in the end you will just setlle for her finishing you off so you can move on with your orgasm.
Renegade
09-04-2006, 08:45 PM
Million is currently winning the thread. By a long shot.
Seriously, there's nothing wrong w/ that girl in the REAL WORLD. Any normal guy would hit that 10 times out of 10, provided no strings attached.
Every guy in life has 4 standards (at least i do)
High= GF/Wife material
Mid= Friends w/ benefits material
Low= "no one should know about this" material
Lowest= Girls that that give you unreciprocated head.
And I love how 80% of the guys in this thread are like "bitch is ugly" yet the 60-70% of women LESS attractive than her (esp at her age) are getting laid all the time. And having boyfriends/husbands.
And i've totally hooked up w/ chicks based mostly on personality. If she's cool, and i'm digging hanging out, and if a girl is MENTALLY sexy, I'd hit it. Maybe i'm just a forward thinking fellow.
white shadow
09-05-2006, 06:17 PM
*E-Vomits Incessantly*
LMAO!!! After a several points written with a certain amount eloquence and an air of pseudo-intellectualism, and then she says: "....I have my financial shit together..." :rofl:
http://jacquelinepassey.blogs.com/photos/uncategorized/terrence_etc_011.jpg Blackheart rises!!!:wasted:
Higher-Jin: What the heck does "paisley" mean? Seriously I looked it up and it doesn't mean anything I think you're referring to.
Hoonyo
09-05-2006, 08:42 PM
i'd fuck her. maybe she's just joking about being a virgin. she is a comedian.
Etcetera
09-06-2006, 02:22 PM
i'd fuck her. maybe she's just joking about being a virgin. she is a comedian.
I guess it's possible she is joking since a lot of female comics aren't funny.
Return of Shiki
09-06-2006, 07:48 PM
I guess it's possible she is joking since a lot of female comics aren't funny.
This bitch can go to hell.
It isn't that she can't get laid, she just can't get the type of guys she wants to fuck her to fuck her which I am sure is due to her pricing herself outside of the market. I hope who ever bones her gives her Super AIDS.
I can't rep you nearly enough. Somebody give this man some green bars.
Dubz C. Brickweed
09-06-2006, 09:25 PM
aka ROLL CANCEL AIDS..there is nothing you can do to stop it :rofl:
Shit, them aids got priority like SF2CE & Turbo giefs throw range.:rofl::looney:
then why is she so concerned about the sex part
Like most people whos parents ain't let em out the house to play with the other kids. Though she's fugly, it don't mean I can't bend her over & tap her from behind, Doggystyle + No ugly face= Donkey Punch opportunity:rofl::rofl::rofl:
An Chin Wo ain't hit it? She lyin, she love sex but she ain't had none. Devirginized virgin tramp...
This is one of the greatest threads of all time.
Everyone please save this thread for Thread of the Year contendership.
Galactic
09-06-2006, 11:09 PM
Ok so the double standard applies here as well.
You know how guys who have sex all the time are studs and girls who do it are whores?
Ok so in this case, this chick is doing it and it's being picked up by this Jane magazine. Fine, it's cool, she's just lonely or attention starved, whatever.
If a GUY was doing this on some magazine like GQ or something like this the guy would be crucified as being a desperate, pathetic, sexist pig loser,
Of course, no guy would admit he's a virgin at 29 ANYWAY, because if he is a virgin at 29, he's a pathetic loser, where a girl who's a virgin at 29 is pure and has her virtues.
What bunk.
Anyway, the girl isn't too bad. Put some glasses, schoolgirl outfit and some high heels on her, and I'd fuck her sideways.
And I'm a -37. I have a modeling contract. It states I have to stay away from the models. Still doesn't make my opinion of her looks any more or less valid.
^_-;
SNAAAAKE
09-06-2006, 11:13 PM
And I'm a -37. I have a modeling contract. It states I have to stay away from the models. Still doesn't make my opinion of her looks any more or less valid.
^_-;
Galatic :tup:
Roxie :tdown:
Warpticon
09-07-2006, 12:03 AM
Of course, no guy would admit he's a virgin at 29 ANYWAY, because if he is a virgin at 29, he's a pathetic loser, where a girl who's a virgin at 29 is pure and has her virtues.
I agree with the overall sentiment: however,
<-----
Serpent
09-07-2006, 12:42 AM
Ok so the double standard applies here as well.
You know how guys who have sex all the time are studs and girls who do it are whores?
Ok so in this case, this chick is doing it and it's being picked up by this Jane magazine. Fine, it's cool, she's just lonely or attention starved, whatever.
If a GUY was doing this on some magazine like GQ or something like this the guy would be crucified as being a desperate, pathetic, sexist pig loser,
Of course, no guy would admit he's a virgin at 29 ANYWAY, because if he is a virgin at 29, he's a pathetic loser, where a girl who's a virgin at 29 is pure and has her virtues.
What bunk.
Anyway, the girl isn't too bad. Put some glasses, schoolgirl outfit and some high heels on her, and I'd fuck her sideways.
And I'm a -37. I have a modeling contract. It states I have to stay away from the models. Still doesn't make my opinion of her looks any more or less valid.
^_-;
I don't actually think it's a double standard either way, but I'm glad you point it out because most people don't want to accept that it's not a double standard. For something to be a double standard, both actions have to be the exact same thing. For women, they basically hide in their castle, pull up the drawbridge, and turtle. A man needs to cross the moat and knock down the walls and rush that castle down. It's quite a different thing to fail at defending your castle repeatedly, and a whole different thing to take over them.
But even with that, exactly who is applying this? Women like to claim that men call women that sleep around sluts, however, how many times have you actually heard men get behind that notion? If you've been on SRK for awhile, you know what happened when our village idiot claimed he didn't want to have sex with "sluts" and liked elves or something, we basically ran him out of town. Women that are "sluts" have absolutely no problems from men. The pathetic "nice guy" is desperately trying to get with them, as the girl repeatedly no sales him and fucks assholes while telling him she wants a nice guy. This is an outright lie, she likes sex, she just wants to fuck with mr. "nice guy" on an emotional level, and she doesn't want to have sex with him specifically. So who makes the standard? Women then. So they really shouldn't be whining about it. It's not "society" that made this. As for men that have sex with a lot of women, once again, men don't really care. Some may be jealous, but the general notion is "don't hate the player, hate the game." So men aren't allowed to negatively comment, but what are women's views? Well, they're free to hate the guy or like him for it, that's up to them, and that is what seems to happen, they have no consensus on it. So basically, once again, we have women refusing to take any accountability for their decisions, and simply pushing blame off to men. This is the hallmark of western women and feminism in general. Instead of giving into this stupid little game, counter with what Galactic said, or if you feel like it, go through the reasoning the way I do.
In the end it comes down to this: Would I have sex with a woman that has slept with many men before me, and, would I have sex with a man that has slept with many women before me? For it to be a double standard, provided that every other condition was the same (arguendo, we know it isn't though), the answer must be different for both, although you probably need a bisexual person to answer it. If your answer is NO to both, then you don't have a double standard, because it's the same standard. I have never seen a man claim they will have sex with men that have slept with many women, but not the reverse. The stupid people that buy into this being a double standard have conveniently decided to hash over this, and have made it a case of "the approval from the opposite sex of one's sexual promiscuity" vs. "the approval from the same sex of one's sexual promiscuity." The argument is men do not approve of female promiscuity, but men do approve of male promiscuity. That is the fallacy. It's supposed to be male approval of female promiscuity vs. female approval of male promiscuity. The next question is again separate, and you can figure it out yourself. The problem is instead of a comparison of the same point, thus creating the "double standard", we have a hybrid mix of two separate statements and then a claim that they are the same "standard". You can see for yourself why this isn't the case.
Or...just use what Galactic said.
Akelexre
09-07-2006, 01:09 AM
Yeah she's not attractive.
I agree in part with Etcetera and Naslectronical.. her standards have likely reached grandiose proportions and the men that find her attractive haven't met her standards so far. She probably has a dogshit attitude on top of that.
I have no patience for people her age that still obsess over sex like they're still in grade school. She missed her tender, meaningful deflowering experience when everyone was doing it in their teens, and there had better be a damn good reason (you're absolutely disfigured, you're sick and you spent the greater part of your life in a hospital, abusive or otherwise unfortunate upbringing, religious conviction, etc.) that justifies her bitching about it now. Everyone her age has done it (and most of them are or have been married by now) and she has to deal with the fact that her eligibility pool has shrunk drastically. Buy an escort, lower your stuck up bullshit standards, whatever--and grow up instead of burdening us with your immature whining.
I hope this is a fake story but I've personally run into this situation a couple times.
This post wins the thread.
Hollow
09-07-2006, 07:24 AM
She looks like Tori Spelling's retarded stunt-double. To reiterate what has been said, her standards are too high. If she was looking for a meaningful relationship, she wouldn't be advertising the virginity lost thing before she tirns 30. It's either fake, or she is full of shit and dilusional. She wants to fuck, fine. Roll up on any man with his dick in his hand. She wants a meaningful relationship, but she puts herself out like she wants sex first, then the relationship afterwards. She is bullshit.
TheDarkPhoenix
09-07-2006, 07:48 AM
^^what serpent said
Master Chibi
09-07-2006, 07:49 AM
I'm 25 and still a virgin.
bah.
D:
Azrael
09-07-2006, 08:15 AM
For women, they basically hide in their castle, pull up the drawbridge, and turtle. A man needs to cross the moat and knock down the walls and rush that castle down. It's quite a different thing to fail at defending your castle repeatedly, and a whole different thing to take over them.
I've used the castle analogy before, just not on SRK. It fits almost perfectly.
I dont think it's men that make a promiscuous woman look bad. Hell, I love sluts/whores. If you get down to why, it's that I would like to be able to have random, uncommitted sex. In order to do that, I need women who are looking to do the same. It would be stupid of me to judge a woman for doing exactly what I want from them.
Warpticon
09-07-2006, 08:59 AM
She looks like Tori Spelling's retarded stunt-double. To reiterate what has been said, her standards are too high. If she was looking for a meaningful relationship, she wouldn't be advertising the virginity lost thing before she tirns 30. It's either fake, or she is full of shit and dilusional. She wants to fuck, fine. Roll up on any man with his dick in his hand. She wants a meaningful relationship, but she puts herself out like she wants sex first, then the relationship afterwards. She is bullshit.
Exactly. You sell what you advertise. Same in life as in business. It's like these broads that go out of their way to dress sexy, freak on dudes at the club, and basically sell themselves as Young and Sexy Stereotype, then get all whiny about how they can't find a man who respects them for their mind. Yeah, and you sure were trying to attract them with your mind, weren't you? The fuck out of here. If you want to do young stuff, party and have fun, go right ahead. It's your life, your prerogative, and I ain't mad at you. But if you're gonna whine and complain about how unlucky!!!! you are because the dude you picked up at the club decided to move on when you got serious, then you need to grab a spoon, pour some milk in a bowl of rat poison, and get it the fuck overwith.
Etcetera
09-07-2006, 09:13 AM
I've used the castle analogy before, just not on SRK. It fits almost perfectly.
I dont think it's men that make a promiscuous woman look bad. Hell, I love sluts/whores. If you get down to why, it's that I would like to be able to have random, uncommitted sex. In order to do that, I need women who are looking to do the same. It would be stupid of me to judge a woman for doing exactly what I want from them.
The only people that hate on sluts are other ladies jealous she isn't getting the same attention and haterade sipping dudes mad she isn't fucking him.
SNAAAAKE
09-07-2006, 09:15 AM
I'm 25 and still a virgin.
bah.
D:
haha wow that sucks AND you cant beat me in cvs..Rolento too fast fo yo ! :looney:
I didnt even know you were 25..thought maybe 21
I'm with million on this one.
http://jacquelinepassey.blogs.com/blog/2006/08/dating_tip_qual.html
just a few short excerpts and a pic
and the woman who wants all this?
http://jacquelinepassey.blogs.com/photos/uncategorized/terrence_etc_011.jpg
I wouldn't touch this woman with a ten foot pole, keep in mind, I'd fuck ANYBODY, I'd pork ugly chicks, fat chicks, slim chicks, fit chicks,
dark chicks, light chicks, small chicks, tall chicks,
round chicks, square chicks, man chicks, dick chicks...
wait... those last two are more of a bloofy thing, i take those back, but I'd never... Eh-Eh--EHHHH--EHVOR fuck a paisley chick..
i thought she is supposed to be digging "attractive" dudes...wow...
im outi
Roberth
RaishinX
09-07-2006, 12:04 PM
Quoting awesomeness again...
Yeah.
She hasn't found a meaningful connection in 29 years. So, naturally, she's going to find it in two months with the help of a magazine so she can make an arbitrary deadline!
Stupid broad. (redundant, I know.) Hence why I wouldn't fuck her in a million years. Half-developed tripe like her has no right to near the glory of my penis.
I have no patience for people her age that still obsess over sex like they're still in grade school. She missed her tender, meaningful deflowering experience when everyone was doing it in their teens, and there had better be a damn good reason (you're absolutely disfigured, you're sick and you spent the greater part of your life in a hospital, abusive or otherwise unfortunate upbringing, religious conviction, etc.) that justifies her bitching about it now. Everyone her age has done it (and most of them are or have been married by now) and she has to deal with the fact that her eligibility pool has shrunk drastically. Buy an escort, lower your stuck up bullshit standards, whatever--and grow up instead of burdening us with your immature whining.
then why is she so concerned about the sex part?
Exactly. You sell what you advertise. Same in life as in business. It's like these broads that go out of their way to dress sexy, freak on dudes at the club, and basically sell themselves as Young and Sexy Stereotype, then get all whiny about how they can't find a man who respects them for their mind. Yeah, and you sure were trying to attract them with your mind, weren't you? The fuck out of here. If you want to do young stuff, party and have fun, go right ahead. It's your life, your prerogative, and I ain't mad at you. But if you're gonna whine and complain about how unlucky!!!! you are because the dude you picked up at the club decided to move on when you got serious, then you need to grab a spoon, pour some milk in a bowl of rat poison, and get it the fuck overwith.
This bitch can go to hell.
It isn't that she can't get laid, she just can't get the type of guys she wants to fuck her to fuck her which I am sure is due to her pricing herself outside of the market. I hope who ever bones her gives her Super AIDS.
This is one of the greatest threads of all time.
Everyone please save this thread for Thread of the Year contendership.
Done!
EvilKing
09-07-2006, 12:06 PM
Even though she does not have a very cute face at all, i would be all over that like STDs on paris hilton's crotch.
Then again, she's probably not a virgin at all
vBulletin® v3.8.0 Beta 4, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.