Gray Fox, post: 958242 wrote:
isn't dropping f bombs against the tos?
Stuart Hayden, post: 958262 wrote:
isn't this still infraction worthy? http://forums.shoryuken.com/showpost.php?p=7951105&postcount=17
savaii64, post: 958263 wrote:
I think I need to re-read the rules. I don't know why that is infraction worthy. We cannot post pics of michael jackson?
Kromo, post: 958265 wrote:
Can I have the date of birth in my profile changed to 1996?
Gray Fox, post: 958267 wrote:
this guy does nothing but spam threads promoting his own shit. Isn't that against the TOS?
Iduno, post: 958266 wrote:
Sounds like someone is either a FG genius joining up at the age of 6 or hunting for lolis...
BeGuiled, post: wrote:
I hate it when people try to badger others just for not speaking up quickly. Can't we just accept the fact that sometimes things like this happen, get along, and live on happily, please?
Cynk22, post: 958275 wrote:
Kinda random but, what is the deal with the neutral rep? Like, what's the point? I LOL'ed when someone gave me it.
Valaris, post: 958276 wrote:
It's when someone gives you rep but doesn't have 500 posts yet. His rep is neutral until he reaches that post minimum.
Valaris, post: 958278 wrote:
You can't. You're not prem. It was a premium member without 500 posts that gave you neutral rep.
Gray Fox, post: 958281 wrote:
So I noticed you can still rep people who have it disabled. If I want to say like "hey I think this was a good post" can they still see that, even though the rep itself doesn't affect their bar or whatnot?
Starcade RIP, post: wrote:
world matchmaking just got spammed pretty hard: