My older (middle) brother, every time I am playing CvS2 or I talk about it, he would jump all over it and say "This game is stupid! It's fucking... this game does not make sense."
If I beat him he would go "That's bullshit! The logic in the (mechanics) game do not even make any sense."
Then he would complain that "This game seems like it is all just hype, there is actually no depth, it's not like 3rd Strike, where everything is beautiful and like true art. This game just seems like another SF4 or SFxT."
He would complain that K-Groove is broken.
Also, he would say "Fuck this game."
From my understanding, he is really salty about this game. He doesn't even hate SF4 as much as he hates this game. He claims that SF3S is better because it "looks like true art," and the "logic" in the game makes sense. Don't get me wrong, I love 3rd Strike too, but I don't fucking bash his game. It's weird. CvS2 is heaps ahead of complexity compared to SF3. His main reason though is simply because CvS2 does not look like an "artistic game" therefore, his hate for it and along with the reasons stated above, verify his extreme hatred for it. Good 3rd Strike players have admitted to me that CvS2 is a really hard game to master. The execution, 6 grooves, RCing, matchups (roster), faster pace, etc...
So what do you guys think? Is CvS2 really true of the things he stated above? Does a game "looking more artistic" prove a valid point in the quality of a game?