TMNTemps wrote: »
the dude spent two years researching everything he needed to know to make the story scientifically plausible.. so I don't think you can poke too many holes in anything to do with the science. Martian soil is so toxic you could never fertilize the soil like that but if ignore that one thing to make the movie possible the rest of it is almost 100% rock solid
ImagineVC wrote: »
buffer window is wayyyy too huge in sfv. necalli can input his QCB motion and still walk forward and then execute his command grab.
at the 1minute 18second mark
blackadde wrote: »
i bet it's not that different than sf4?
i mean the 'tech' part of that is nonsense, because you could just walk forward and quickly do qcb to get the exact same result. i guess maybe you'd lose a small handful of frames while you go into crouch but ...
Duck Strong wrote: »
For the sake of comparison, what is the buffer window in both games?
zakky wrote: »
I liked Mad Max, but I've completely forgotten it whereas these two have stayed with me.
dragondan wrote: »
hi everyone, happy 2016!
You guys are all central alberta?
Infil wrote: »
i have literally never listened to a single second of any justin bieber song
i couldn't even tell you the name of a song he's done, let alone what it sounds like