Ok I’m about to open a can of worms here but I want to know what all the hate is about. To start off I will say that I’m a controllermax staff member but I’m not beyond looking at aspects on both sides nor am i compensated in any way with cm devices. I do what I do in their forums for the community and nothing else, Basically I’m a member like everyone else. With this disclaimer said I’ll dive right in.
I know CM devices are banned by tournemts and brooks super converters are not. Now what I want is positive feedback why it is banned and why is theirso much animosity towards it?
With all the current updates cm can take ANY fightstick that registers it as a ps3, xbox360, Xbox 1 or ds4 and make it work on all these consoles. For one CM is not illegal as it uses stock conteoers to authentic the system then be crossed platformed to any other console while brook super converters use illegal hacked protocols to authenticate the system. CM device can also piggyback ds4 controllers using a usb hub to make the 8 min timeout obsolete. There is also very minimal lag. The cm device also has tournemt mode that applies to all criteria for it to be tournament friendly.
With all this said why is this device so hated in the fighting community?
Brooks super converters use illegal hacked software to authenticate the console also u have to buy multiple usb sticks to active ,all ceoss platforms, while cm is a one stop shop! With all the newest updates Cm has full touch pad support and button remapping for non tournament payers. I just can’t wrap my head around why this is so hard to get! There’s a reason why super converters are not sold to major retailers and cm is. I’m pretty sure ill get a lot of shot for speaking my mind but I’d love to hear others prove me wrong on this.