So today I was scrolling through my twitter when I came across a post by Carl white AKA perfect legend saying that he was getting annoyed when he was playing a game that wasn’t his main and people were getting hype when they beat him. I replied back telling him that if its not his main then why should he care? He obviously cares about it to tweet. so he should take the game more seriously. We get into a heated argument that can be viewed on my twitter @ClutchCombo or his twitter @PerfectLegend. and he ends up blocking me because I told him that I think Korea is the best at SF4 right now and that America is the best at mk9 and I told him that he and daigo aren’t in the same league as of yet.
I didn’t make this article to stir drama or to create a scene, in fact I did it for the opposite. I wanted to know if what I said or did crossed the line. All I see was me giving a “top player” a little incentive to play other games and maybe he can pop off but it seemed like Carl got really angry. Is this what we do now? Is this what the FGC is? Although the community can be helpful and rough at the same time I feel that some of the top players feel that because they get screen time that they are better than everyone else. They can treat/talk to anyone anyway they want and thats not right. Why do we praise someone who doesn’t give back? I just want some answers in where we go from here because every time I see good things for us they get clouded by the negative people who join the FGC. Personally I blame greed.
Someone give me some feedback.
(I was really tired when I wrote this Sorry, I wrote this in the wrong thread so I reposted here.)